Dailyr

X Ditches Revenue Share for Original Content Rewards

· news

The Creator Conundrum: A Shift in Rewards, a Shift in Responsibility

X, a prominent platform, is abandoning its revenue-sharing program and introducing an Original Content Rewards Program. On the surface, this move seems like a natural evolution. However, closer inspection reveals a complex story.

The new program focuses on rewarding creators for original content, but some question whether this approach perpetuates the notion that creativity and innovation are reserved for those with established influence or prestige. The emphasis on “original writing, reporting, photos, videos, memes, or illustrations” raises questions about what constitutes originality in today’s digital age.

To participate in the program, users must meet strict eligibility criteria: be 18 or older, reside in a country where X is available, hold a Premium subscription, have at least 500 verified followers, and garner 500,000 Home timeline views from verified users within the last 90 days. This creates an impenetrable barrier for new creators, who often rely on engagement and visibility to establish themselves.

X’s shift towards incentivizing creators to produce original content also raises concerns about curation in shaping our online experiences. By defining “original content” as anything from writing and reporting to photos and videos, with the caveat that adding value or commentary to others’ work is essential, users may feel pressured to curate existing content rather than create new material.

This move comes on the heels of X’s March update to its revenue-sharing program, which weighted engagement from users’ home regions more heavily. This change was aimed at combating fake American personas but also rewarded those with established influence and existing audiences.

The struggles of online content creators are far from new. What’s striking is how X’s moves mirror broader trends in the tech industry: an emphasis on “disruption” and “innovation,” coupled with a reluctance to challenge existing power dynamics. The Original Content Rewards Program can be seen as both a symptom of these larger issues and an attempt to address them.

As we await answers, one thing is clear: the world of online content creation has never been more complex – or demanding.

Reader Views

  • CS
    Correspondent S. Tan · field correspondent

    X's Original Content Rewards Program raises more questions than answers about its true intentions and potential impact on the online creator community. While rewarding original content is a laudable goal, the eligibility criteria and definition of "originality" create an uneven playing field that favors established creators over newcomers. What's concerning is how this shift towards curation may inadvertently perpetuate echo chambers, where users prioritize aggregating existing content rather than producing genuinely innovative work. The devil lies in the details – or rather, the algorithms driving these changes – and we need a more transparent explanation from X about its vision for the platform's future.

  • CM
    Columnist M. Reid · opinion columnist

    X's Original Content Rewards Program is less about empowering creators and more about reinforcing the status quo. By prioritizing established users with large followings and views, the platform inadvertently creates a barrier to entry for new voices. The emphasis on originality also raises questions about what happens when algorithms determine what constitutes "original" content – do we risk perpetuating a culture of remixing existing ideas rather than encouraging genuine innovation? It's time for X to rethink its approach to rewarding creators and prioritize diversity over dominance.

  • AD
    Analyst D. Park · policy analyst

    The Original Content Rewards Program is yet another attempt by X to privilege established creators over newcomers, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of influence and prestige. What's concerning is that this approach ignores the fundamental role of user engagement in shaping online discourse. By emphasizing originality over curation, X may inadvertently drive creators to repackage existing content as "new" or "value-added," rather than encouraging genuine innovation. This oversight could ultimately undermine the platform's stated goal of promoting unique voices and perspectives.

Related articles

More from Dailyr

View as Web Story →